https://gov.optimism.io/t/l2beat-delegate-communication-thread/4263/12
We're voting abstain as we're participating in the security council.
At SEEDGov we voted FOR this proposal. Although there is a nearly 200% budget increase compared to Season 5, and no benchmarks were provided relative to similar budgets in other DAOs, we believe the Security Council remains an essential entity. It will serve as a critical safeguard for all chains in the Superchain.
https://gov.optimism.io/t/brichis-delegate-communication-thread/6353/29
We support the Security Council requests and owns its budget from the governance, and operate for the governance. The appropriate compensation balance between the lead and the members can be revisited in the next season.
Vote For. The Security Council should answer to governance, so it needs to be funded by governance, rather than the Foundation.
Easy yes, seemed like they got screwed last season from RF6.
It's good to see the increase in budget for the council holding the gates!
Considering the importance of the council, the current budget is a reasonable ask, especially considering the intensity of when they must operate
We support this proposal to ensure the continued operational readiness and accountability of the Security Council. The budget covers the important work of its 13 members, like signing protocol upgrades, handling emergencies, and staying active. It also includes funding for tools like monitoring systems, emergency alerts, and performance incentives. This is a key step to ensure the Security Council can continue to protect Optimism’s governance and security.
The 295k OP budget is justifiable for the operations of the security council
The amphibian says, “Absolutely!”
Loading more votes...