while the budget is larger than perhaps necessary, this intent is focused on lowering governance friction in order to make it more understandable, scalable, and accessible by everyday op holders. most governances become opaque and bureaucratic over time, with rigid processes that are inaccessible to the casual tokenholder. an illustrative example is how complex the process to propose at makerdao is, which we tweeted about with a primer for those interested. as optimism governance becomes more complex and continues to evolve, it’s of paramount importance that small and casual tokenholders are not forced onto the sidelines by high-friction knowledge and procedural requirements. optimism is blessed with thousands of voting/delegating tokenholders today, which is in stark contrast to most other protocols. maintaining this level of participation, transparency, and diversity of stakeholders is absolutely critical. we look forward to seeing initiatives proposed under intent 4.
Voting for all intent budgets, it is a worthwhile experiment and promising iteration in governance.
Read our rationale at our communication thread: https://gov.optimism.io/t/seed-latam-delegate-communication-thread/2950
voting for the proposal.
Loading more votes...